City-building weapons ban in works
by Ray Lightner
Oct 11, 2012 | 2179 views | 6 6 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Griffin will be banning weapons from city government buildings.

The Griffin Board of Commissioners on Tuesday unanimously approved a first reading of the change in city ordinances which upon second reading restricts defined weapons from certain government buildings. Griffin Police Chief Frank Strickland told the commissioners the change “is aimed at this room when you’re in session.”

When asked about the rest of the building, Strickland said, “I imagine if it was a legal permit holder not in knowledge of the ordinance we would be lenient.”

Strickland said a new provision in state law authorizes municipal governments, by ordinance, to restrict the carrying of handguns, long guns and knives in municipal courthouses and government buildings. He said that when the room is used for Municipal Court, “We run everyone through a metal detector.”

The change would have no impact on the Spalding County Courthouse, any of the county’s government buildings or any state or federal facilities within the city. The legislation includes definitions for the weapons, including the length of prohibited knife blades (5 inches or longer).

A handgun is defined as a firearm of any description, loaded or unloaded, from which any shot, bullet or other missile can be discharged by action of an explosive where the length of the barrel does not exceed 12 inches. This length does not include any revolving or detachable magazine or breech nor does it include a gun which fires a single shot of .46 centimeters or less in diameter.

Long gun refers to a firearm with a barrel of at least 18 inches and overall length of at least 26 inches, made or designed to be fired from the shoulder and that fires shotgun shells or metallic cartridges in a single pull of the trigger. Long gun shall not include a gun which fires a single shot of .46 centimeters or less in diameter.

The ordinance exempts city personnel acting in their job capacity, certified law enforcement officers and court personnel, but restricts all other persons from possessing or carrying a knife, handgun or long gun in a courthouse or portion of a government building in the city of Griffin when judicial proceedings, council meetings, committee meetings, board meetings or any other duly noticed meetings are being conducted in the building.

The provision also will not allow knives in government buildings or courthouses as otherwise prohibited by state law.

The city also adopted the county’s Emergency Management Plan, which was revised in May and has been adopted by the cities of Sunny Side and Orchard Hill and by the county. When asked, Strickland said there was “no mention of firearms anywhere. It’s just who’s in charge of and in support of who.”
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Bmart1981
|
October 12, 2012
Check your state laws Commissioners and Chief....there is already one "on the books" O.C.G.A. § 16-11-127

State law already makes it illegal to carry weapons in a municipally-owned building
josephwgordon
|
October 12, 2012
lol I was wondering as I read this story. I too thought this was a rule already.
pach40
|
October 12, 2012
I have noted in public places an increase in a pistol in a holster openly exposed. The other day in CVS, I asked the man politely, ARE YOU A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER? His answer was NO, I AM A PRIVATE CITIZEN WITH A PERMIT AND IT IS LEGAL!

I just walked away.

I have not really found a reference for "open carry" but I did read an online summary of concealed weapons.

Perhaps it was the man's right to carry a pistol openly seen. But that unsettled me. I understand that any business may post a NO FIREARMS ALLOWED ON PREMISES UNLESS LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS sign,

or something that meets a law's criteria.

I have yet to see one, but if those who wish to have openly seen firearms HAVE the right to bandy

macho,I will choose another place to shop any time I see this.

PACH
JulieBrandenburg
|
October 12, 2012
pach40: why would you even question this man about him carrying a firearm? I myself do not have a problem with people carrying firearms in public, which this gentleman was doing so legally. He perhaps could save your life if one of the ILLEGAL gun carrying thugs decides to open fire in public--like happens on the news all the time. You are fooling yourself by being uncomfortable--you should be more concerned with the people who will hide them so that they can do their dirty deeds.
josephwgordon
|
October 12, 2012
I agree with the permit holder. I live in Clayton County, and not only is it legal for me to carry, but it is my duity. Watch the news, and bad people are everywhere. I carry to protect my family, myself, and innocent people all around me. To get the permit, I had an extensive background check, national and local. We are not the bad guys, we are practicing our second ammendment.
citizenhuman
|
October 12, 2012
Here you go PACH.

http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/georgias-carry-laws-explained/frequently-asked-questions/#Places_Off_Limits

You'll find that most of the people who carry are very responsible. Many are former military or retired law enforcement. I have recently obtained my weapons carry permit, as I see it as my duty as a citizen to carry.

There was already a law on the books that prohibits carry in government buildings.